Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 140 (3):335 - 358 (2008)
|Abstract||This paper presents a number of objections to Jeffrey King's quantificational theory of complex demonstratives. Some of these objections have to do with modality, whereas others concern attitude ascriptions. Various possible replies are considered. The debate between quantificational theorists and direct reference theorists over complex demonstratives is compared with recent debates concerning definite descriptions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kirk Ludwig (2000). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives. Mind 109 (434):199 - 240.
Eros Corazza (2003). Complex Demonstratives Qua Singular Terms. Erkenntnis 59 (2):263 - 283.
Eros Corazza (2003). Review: Complex Demonstratives: A Quantificational Account. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (448):734-740.
J. Stanley (2002). Complex Demonstratives: A Quantificational Account. Philosophical Review 111 (4):605-609.
David Braun (2008). Complex Demonstratives and Their Singular Contents. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (1):57-99.
Jeffrey C. King (2008). Complex Demonstratives, QI Uses, and Direct Reference. Philosophical Review 117 (1):99-117.
Jeffrey C. King (2008). Complex Demonstratives as Quantifiers: Objections and Replies. Philosophical Studies 141 (2):209 - 242.
David Braun (2008). Persisting Problems for a Quantificational Theory of Complex Demonstratives. Philosophical Studies 141 (3):243 - 262.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #53,605 of 723,043 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,043 )
How can I increase my downloads?