Point and Counterpoint: Should HECs Consider Financial Costs of Care During Case Review?

HEC Forum 4 (4) (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Point and counterpoint. Should HECs consider financial costs of care during case review?Evelyn J. van Allen & K. Iserson - 1992 - Hec Forum: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues 4 (1):51.
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs provide advice counter to the law when they believe it inappropriate?Robert D. Orr & D. Mathieu - 1991 - Hec Forum: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues 3 (3):167.
Smokers, virgins, equity and health care costs.H. V. McLachlan - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (4):209-213.
Motives and Markets in Health Care.Daniel Hausman - 2013 - Journal of Practical Ethics 1 (2):64-84.
Healthcare ethics: A patient-centered decision model. [REVIEW]Alfonso R. Oddo - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):125 - 134.
Unhealthy Health Care Costs.J. K. Shelton & J. M. Janosi - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):7-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-05

Downloads
1 (#1,903,274)

6 months
1 (#1,475,652)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Bruening
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references