British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):209-223 (2003)
|Abstract||Roger Scruton's extraordinarily rich and impressive book The Aesthetics of Music has not received the attention it deserves. In this paper I take issue with one of its most striking claims, namely that the basic perceptions of music are informed by spatial concepts understood metaphorically. To evaluate this claim it is necessary to grasp Scruton's theory of metaphor, which has largely been neglected. I sketch his theory and derive from it the essence of his claim about the fundamental role of spatial metaphors in musical experience. With the issue clarified in this way, I attempt to show that the claim is not plausible.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Byron Almén (2008). A Theory of Musical Narrative. Indiana University Press.
Andy Hamilton (2007). Music and the Aural Arts. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):46-63.
Roger Scruton (2004). Wittgenstein and the Understanding of Music. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):1-9.
Michael Spitzer (2004). Metaphor and Musical Thought. University of Chicago Press.
Nancy Sue Love (2002). "Singing for Our Lives": Women's Music and Democratic Politics. Hypatia 17 (4):71-94.
Roger Scruton (1999). The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford University Press.
Nick Zangwill (2010). Scruton's Musical Experiences. Philosophy 85 (1):91-104.
Malcolm Budd (2006). The Characterization of Aesthetic Qualities by Essential Metaphors and Quasi-Metaphors. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):133-143.
Malcolm Budd (2008). Aesthetic Essays. Oxford University Press.
Roger Scruton (2004). Musical Movement: A Reply to Budd. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):184-187.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #36,484 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?