Graduate studies at Western
In Daniel Kolak & R. Martin (eds.), The Experience of Philosophy. Wadsworth Publishing (1995)
|Abstract||The words quoted above distill the common secular conception of death. If we decline the traditional religious reassurances of an afterlife, or their fuzzy new age equivalents, and instead take the hard-boiled and thoroughly modern materialist view of death, then we likely end up with Gonzalez-Cruzzi. Rejecting visions of reunions with loved ones or of crossing over into the light, we anticipate the opposite: darkness, silence, an engulfing emptiness. But we would be wrong|
|Keywords||Afterlife Death Metaphysics Nothingness Subjectivity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ari Joffe (2010). Are Recent Defences of the Brain Death Concept Adequate? Bioethics 24 (2):47-53.
Winston Chiong (2005). Brain Death Without Definitions. Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
WIlliam Hasker, Afterlife. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Shelly Kagan (2012). Death. Yale University Press.
Brian Lightbody (2009). Death and Liberation: A Critical Investigation of Death in Sartre's Being and Nothingness. Minerva--An Internet Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):85-98.
Ingvar Horgby (1965). Immediacy - Subjectivity - Revelation. Inquiry 8 (1-4):84 – 117.
Stephen T. Davis (ed.) (1989). Death and Afterlife. St. Martin's Press.
Antonio Calcagno (2008). Being, Aevum , and Nothingness: Edith Stein on Death and Dying. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 41 (1):59-72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads190 ( #1,971 of 754,610 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #11,522 of 754,610 )
How can I increase my downloads?