Justice and the NICE approach

Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):99-102 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When thinking about population level healthcare priority setting decisions, such as those made by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, good medical ethics requires attention to three main principles of health justice: (1) cost-effectiveness, an aspect of beneficence, (2) non-discrimination, and (3) priority to the worse off in terms of both current severity of illness and lifetime health. Applying these principles requires consideration of the identified patients who benefit from decisions and the unidentified patients who bear the opportunity costs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

NICE discrimination.M. Rawlins - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (12):683-684.
Evidence, ethics and inclusion: a broader base for NICE. [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):111-121.
On Sen on comparative justice.Chandran Kukathas - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2):196-204.
Ageism and equality.John Harris & Sadie Regmi - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):263-266.
Self inflicted harm--NICE in ethical self destruct mode?S. Holm - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):125-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
24 (#654,246)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?