- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Governing Gene Drive Technologies: A Qualitative Interview Study
AJOB Empirical Bioethics 13 (2):107-124 (2022)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Experts’ moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study.Annelien L. Bredenoord, Karin R. Jongsma & N. de Graeff - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-15.
Beyond Mendelian Genetics: Anticipatory Biomedical Ethics and Policy Implications for the Use of CRISPR Together with Gene Drive in Humans.Michael W. Nestor & Richard L. Wilson - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (1):133-144.
Driven to extinction? The ethics of eradicating mosquitoes with gene-drive technologies.Jonathan Pugh - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (9):578-581.
Ten standard Objections to Qualitative Research Interviews.Steinar Kvale - 1994 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 25 (2):147-173.
CRISPR and the Ethics of Gene Drive in Mosquitoes.Tina Rulli - 2018 - In David Boonin, Katrina L. Sifferd, Tyler K. Fagan, Valerie Gray Hardcastle, Michael Huemer, Daniel Wodak, Derk Pereboom, Stephen J. Morse, Sarah Tyson, Mark Zelcer, Garrett VanPelt, Devin Casey, Philip E. Devine, David K. Chan, Maarten Boudry, Christopher Freiman, Hrishikesh Joshi, Shelley Wilcox, Jason Brennan, Eric Wiland, Ryan Muldoon, Mark Alfano, Philip Robichaud, Kevin Timpe, David Livingstone Smith, Francis J. Beckwith, Dan Hooley, Russell Blackford, John Corvino, Corey McCall, Dan Demetriou, Ajume Wingo, Michael Shermer, Ole Martin Moen, Aksel Braanen Sterri, Teresa Blankmeyer Burke, Jeppe von Platz, John Thrasher, Mary Hawkesworth, William MacAskill, Daniel Halliday, Janine O’Flynn, Yoaav Isaacs, Jason Iuliano, Claire Pickard, Arvin M. Gouw, Tina Rulli, Justin Caouette, Allen Habib, Brian D. Earp, Andrew Vierra, Subrena E. Smith, Danielle M. Wenner, Lisa Diependaele, Sigrid Sterckx, G. Owen Schaefer, Markus K. Labude, Harisan Unais Nasir, Udo Schuklenk, Benjamin Zolf & Woolwine (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy. Springer Verlag. pp. 509-521.
Eradicating Mosquitoes? The Promise and Peril of Gene Drive Technologies.Bang-Ook Jun - 2017 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 27 (4):113-115.
Public Deliberation about Gene Editing in the Wild.Michael K. Gusmano, Gregory E. Kaebnick, Karen J. Maschke, Carolyn P. Neuhaus & Ben Curran Wills - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):2-10.
The Legal Framework Concerning Gene-Editing Techniques in the UK: Problems and Solutions.Angela Grunert - 2019 - In Jochen Taupitz & Silvia Deuring (eds.), Rechtliche Aspekte der Genom-Editierung an der Menschlichen Keimbahn : A Comparative Legal Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 457-482.
Framing a phenomenological interview: what, why and how.Simon Høffding & Kristian Martiny - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):539-564.
Regulating animals with gene drive systems: lessons from the regulatory assessment of a genetically engineered mosquito.Zahra Meghani & Jennifer Kuzma - 2018 - Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1).
Life Formed: Evolutionary Design and the Futures of a Political Biology.Aubrey Yee - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa
Walking a Fine Germline: Synthesizing Public Opinion and Legal Precedent to Develop Policy Recommendations for Heritable Gene-Editing.Shawna Benston - 2022 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (3):421-431.
Fair Governance of Biotechnology: Patents, Private Governance, and Procedural Justice.Nienke de Graeff, Léon E. Dijkman, Karin R. Jongsma & Annelien L. Bredenoord - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (12):57-59.
The Need for Minority Languages in Borderland Conditions: Field Research Methodology.Svetlana Moskvitcheva & Alain Viaut - 2021 - In Tatiana B. Agranat & Leyli R. Dodykhudoeva (eds.), Strategies for Knowledge Elicitation: The Experience of the Russian School of Field Linguistics. Springer Verlag. pp. 63-83.
Is the qualitative research interview an acceptable medium for research with palliative care patients and carers?Marjolein Gysels, Cathy Shipman & Irene J. Higginson - 2008 - BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):7-.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-04-29
Downloads
15 (#943,292)
6 months
5 (#628,512)
2022-04-29
Downloads
15 (#943,292)
6 months
5 (#628,512)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Gene Drives as Interventions into Nature: the Coproduction of Ontology and Morality in the Gene Drive Debate.Keje Boersma, Bernice Bovenkerk & David Ludwig - 2023 - NanoEthics 17 (1):1-25.
Alleviating the burden of malaria with gene drive technologies? A biocentric analysis of the moral permissibility of modifying malaria mosquitoes.Nienke de Graeff, Karin Rolanda Jongsma & Annelien L. Bredenoord - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (11):765-771.
References found in this work
Community engagement in global health research that advances health equity.Bridget Pratt & Jantina de Vries - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (7):454-463.
Community Engagement and Field Trials of Genetically Modified Insects and Animals.Carolyn P. Neuhaus - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (1):25-36.
Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa.Ciara Staunton, Paulina Tindana, Melany Hendricks & Keymanthri Moodley - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):13.
Experts’ moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study.Annelien L. Bredenoord, Karin R. Jongsma & N. de Graeff - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-15.
Fair Resource Allocation to Health Research: Priority Topics for Bioethics Scholarship.Adnan A. Hyder & Bridget Pratt - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (4):454-466.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-vk9kt uwo