David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
According to evolutionist Francisco Ayala, Darwin’s greatest achievement was to show that the organized complexity of living things could be brought about without recourse to a designing intelligence. Given this view of Darwin’s achievement, what evolutionary biology has come to mean by “evolution” is an unintelligent or blind form of it. This was brought home to me two years ago at a debate in which I participated. I was invited, along with my colleague and friend Michael Behe, to debate Darwinists Kenneth Miller and Robert Pennock at the American Museum of Natural History in Manhattan. The debate was initially titled “Blind Evolution or Intelligent Design?” Yet, when the debate actually took place on April 23, 2002, the program bulletin distributed at the event quietly dropped the word “blind” and titled the debate simply “Evolution or Intelligent Design?” The original title was more accurate. Intelligent design, the view for which Behe and I were arguing, is opposed to blind evolution, not to evolution simpliciter.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William A. Dembski (2002). No Free Lunch Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased Without Intelligence.
Michael J. Behe (2001). Reply to My Critics: A Response to Reviews of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):683-707.
Sahotra Sarkar (2011). Sober on Intelligent Design. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.
Lee Cronk (2006). Intelligent Design in Cultural Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):352-353.
William Dembski, Intelligent Design's Contribution to the Debate Over Evolution: A Reply to Henry Morris.
Philippe Gagnon (2007). Contenu, Enjeux Et Diversité des Acceptions de L’Intelligent Design En Contexte Étatsunien. Connaître. Cahiers de l'Association Foi Et Culture Scientifique 26:9-43.
Robert T. Pennock, Should Students Be Able to Opt Out of Evolution? Some Philosophical Considerations.
Jason Borenstein (2009). The Endless "Controversy:" Evolution and Its Critics. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 3 (2).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #234,743 of 1,911,053 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #459,551 of 1,911,053 )
How can I increase my downloads?