In Service to Others: A New Evolutionary Perspective on Human Enhancement

Hastings Center Report 51 (6):33-43 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In enhancement ethics, evolutionary theory has been largely perceived as supporting liberal views on enhancement, where decisions to enhance are predominantly regulated by the principle of individual autonomy. In this paper I critique this perception in light of recent scientific developments. Cultural evolutionary theory suggests a picture where individual interests are entangled with community interests, and this undermines the applicability of the principle of autonomy. This is particularly relevant for enhancement ethics, given how – I argue – decisions to enhance are often influenced by desires to increase social status. The “service view on enhancement”, based on principles of service and trust, is proposed as offering better guidance for the challenges of social living.

Similar books and articles

Service and Status Competition May Help Explain Perceived Ethical Acceptability.Hugh Desmond - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):258-260.
A Thomistic appraisal of human enhancement technologies.Jason T. Eberl - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):289-310.
Is human enhancement a threat to solidarity?Ruud ter Meulen - 2017 - Acta Philosophica 26 (2):307-322.
Integration of cognitive and moral enhancement.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
Human freedom and enhancement.Jan-Christoph Heilinger & Katja Crone - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (1):13-21.
The myth of the moral enhancement: Back to the future?Veselin Mitrovic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):111-123.
Enhancement in Sport, and Enhancement outside Sport.Thomas Douglas - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
The right not to be normal as the essence of freedom.Anita Silvers - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 18 (1):79-85.
Should we enhance animals?S. Chan - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):678-683.
An Argument against Arguments for Enhancement. [REVIEW]Michael J. Selgelid - 2008 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-14

Downloads
312 (#64,470)

6 months
108 (#39,800)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh Desmond
Leibniz Universität Hannover

Citations of this work

Personhood, Welfare, and Enhancement.Hugh Desmond - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):37-39.

Add more citations