Pragmatic enrichment, issues and domain goals

Mind and Language 38 (3):669-692 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I propose an inquisitive approach to semantic underdetermination using the model of issue resolution to describe how occasion meanings are determined in the process of pragmatic enrichment. I appeal to “Travis cases” to motivate the account of semantic underdetermination based on alternative ways for some objectato be F. When interpreting a sentence, we look how to narrow down the space of metalinguistic alternatives and achieve the state where a metalinguistic issue is resolved. I suggest that, in doing this, we primarily rely on contextual domain goals, preferring those alternatives which are conducive to the goal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pragmatic enrichment as coherence raising.Peter Pagin - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):59-100.
Subsentential utterances, ellipsis, and pragmatic enrichment.Alison Hall - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):222-250.
Pragmatic Enrichment.Francois Recanati - 2010 - In Delia Fara & Gillian Russell (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. Routledge. pp. 67-78.
Free enrichment or hidden indexicals?Alison Hall - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (4):426-456.
Impossible interpretations, impossible demands.Francesco Pupa - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (3):269-287.
Local pragmatics: reply to Mandy Simons.François Recanati - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (5):493-508.
Natural Goals of Actions in Aristotle.Hendrik Lorenz - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (4):583--600.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-16

Downloads
20 (#752,463)

6 months
7 (#416,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tamara Dobler
University of East Anglia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Belief as Question‐Sensitive.Seth Yalcin - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97 (1):23-47.
Questions in montague english.Charles L. Hamblin - 1973 - Foundations of Language 10 (1):41-53.
A theory of focus interpretation.Mats Rooth - 1992 - Natural Language Semantics 1 (1):75-116.
Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions.Robyn Carston - 2021 - Mind and Language 36 (1):108-133.

View all 31 references / Add more references