Ethics of a Physiotherapist: Touch, Corporeality, Intimacy—Based on the Experience of Elderly Patients

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry:1-14 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative study investigating the application of physiotherapists’ professional ethics in practice with respect to touch, intimacy, and corporeality during therapy, based on the experiences of elderly patients. As the relationship in a physiotherapy session is multidimensional, the study considered three levels: physical contact, verbal contact, and the conditions in which the therapy took place. The aim of this study was to find out what values are of importance to older people during a physiotherapy session, with emphasis on the categories of touch, corporeality, and intimacy. The studied group consisted of sixteen male and female physiotherapy patients aged between sixty-six and ninety-two years. The study was conducted according to the grounded theory methodology. The research material consisted of transcriptions of free targeted interviews, which were subjected to a process of coding and analysis. As a result of data analyses, three superior categories have been identified—safety, anxiety, interpersonal relationship—and three a priori categories stemming from the characteristic features of the study area—touch, corporeality, and intimacy. The a priori categories did not appear independently in statements made by the respondents, but instead seemed to be components of superior categories. The most important values indicated by the respondents concerned the interpersonal relationship with their physiotherapist and the feeling of safety and care. In terms of touch, corporeality, and intimacy, the respondents indicated, among others, the importance of predictability, a sense of security, privacy, and acceptance of the body.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics and genetics.Bmj Publishing Group Ltd And Institute Of Medical Ethics - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):170-170.
Dignity of the elderly: An introduction.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (2):99-101.
Bibliography of society, ethics, and the life sciences.Sharmon Sollitto & Robert M. Veatch (eds.) - 1973 - Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Hastings Center, Institute of Society, Ethics, and the Life Sciences.
Should the decisions of ethics committees be based on community values?Heta Häyry - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (1):57-60.
Rosamond Rhodes: The trusted doctor: medical ethics and professionalism.Caitlin Maples - 2022 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 43 (5):421-424.
Methodological concerns in bioethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):17-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-17

Downloads
5 (#1,557,834)

6 months
5 (#703,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is Touch?Matthew Ratcliffe - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.

Add more references