“Dilettantes of Life.” Franco-German Refractions of Anthropogenesis in Twentieth Century Philosophy

In Giuseppe Bianco, Charles T. Wolfe & Gertrudis Van de Vijver (eds.), Canguilhem and Continental Philosophy of Biology. Springer. pp. 61-83 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is intriguing to observe that the massive rise of a contemporary set of so-called life sciences at the turn of the twenty-first century has not only spurred philosophers of vastly different backgrounds worldwide to rethink the very concepts of “life,” “the living” or of “lived experience,” to name but a handful. What is more, the literal revival of this terminology has allowed historians of modern philosophy to shed new and unwont light on one genealogical compound in particular: that of the quite often charged and complex relations between French and German positions in twentieth-century philosophical thought. My paper aims at a specification of this new map of Franco-German philosophy that has secretly and insistently been centered upon the concept of life. On one level, it discusses an antagonism: whereas the paradigmatic tradition of modern German philosophical anthropology (Scheler, Plessner, Gehlen) has coined the notion of a philosophical biology (philosophische Biologie), French thought, in reverse, witnessed the project of a biological philosophy (philosophie biologique), most pronouncedly in the historical epistemology of Georges Canguilhem. The paper will reflect on the diametrical antagonism between these two formulae. In its extended first part, however, it also tries to unearth the shared roots and sources of these two genealogies, that is of the French and the German constellation respectively. Attention will be drawn to the empirical biologies that resonated stronly both with thinkers such as Scheler, Plessner and Gehlen in Germany, and with figures such as Jacques Lacan or Raymond Ruyer, if it comes to the “French connection.” Thus, the overall discursive refraction between the conceptions of philosophical biology and biological philosophy does not rule out, but rather imply a corporate genealogy that traverses the works of Hermann Klaatsch, Paul Alsberg and Louis Bolk, and the history of the radical divergence between modern French and German philosophy on the subject of the philosophy and the science of life is finally attenuated by a space of unsuspected encounters.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Twentieth century German philosophy.Paul Gorner - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Michael Oakeshott: An Introduction.Paul Franco - 2004 - Yale University Press.
(Dis-) Similarities: Remarks on “Austrian” and “German” Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century.Christian Damböck - 2020 - In Denis Fisette, Guillaume Fréchette & Friedrich Stadler (eds.), Franz Brentano and Austrian Philosophy. New York: Springer. pp. 169--180.
German.Claudia Wich-Reif - 2019 - In Ludger Kühnhardt & Tilman Mayer (eds.), The Bonn Handbook of Globality: Volume 1. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 387-395.
Language and Thought. [REVIEW]Robert J. Dostal - 1991 - Review of Metaphysics 45 (1):115-117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-13

Downloads
1 (#1,905,932)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ebke Thomas
Universität Potsdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references