“Fiat Justitia ruat caelum”. Is This a Good Guide to the Role of a Specialist Appeal Court Judge?

In Knut Almestad, Jean-Luc Baechler, Benedikt Bogason, Henrik Bull, Francis Delaporte, Luis José Diez Canseco Núñez, Peter Freeman, Vladimir Golitsyn, Irmgard Griss, Marc Jaeger, Koen Lenaerts, Paul Mahoney, Andreas Mundt, Sven Norberg, Toril Marie Øie, Þorgeir Örlygsson, Anne-José Paulsen, Georges Ravarani, Hubertus Schumacher, Vassilios Skouris, Gian-Flurin Steinegger, Sven Erik Svedman, Antonio Tizzano, Marc van der Woude, Bo Vesterdorf & Jean-Claude Wiwinius (eds.), The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 293-305 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Legal maxims can be of great help in establishing rules or in turning inchoate ideas into something concrete. The phrase “fiat justitia ruat caelum” seems to tell the judge that his or her task is to do justice and not to worry too much about the wider consequences. The implications of this maxim are the subject of this short paper.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Job’s Dilemma: Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.Paolo Gomarasca - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (3):95--115.
Plea Bargaining and the Administration of Criminal Justice in Nigeria: A Moral Critique.Sule Peter Echewija - 2017 - IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion and Philosophy 3 (2):35–47.
On the rationale of Kant‘s categorial imperative.Nicholas Rescher - 2000 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 3.
Verdict and sentence cover and Levinas on the robe of justice.Robert Gibbs - 2009 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1):73-89.
Verdict and Sentence: Cover and Levinas on the Robe of Justice.Robert Gibbs - 2006 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1-2):73-89.
For Whom Are Judgments Written?Benedikt Bogason & Þorgeir Örlygsson - 2019 - In Knut Almestad, Jean-Luc Baechler, Benedikt Bogason, Henrik Bull, Francis Delaporte, Luis José Diez Canseco Núñez, Peter Freeman, Vladimir Golitsyn, Irmgard Griss, Marc Jaeger, Koen Lenaerts, Paul Mahoney, Andreas Mundt, Sven Norberg, Toril Marie Øie, Þorgeir Örlygsson, Anne-José Paulsen, Georges Ravarani, Hubertus Schumacher, Vassilios Skouris, Gian-Flurin Steinegger, Sven Erik Svedman, Antonio Tizzano, Marc van der Woude, Bo Vesterdorf & Jean-Claude Wiwinius (eds.), The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 223-231.
On the Burden of Proof.James Cargile - 1997 - Philosophy 72 (279):59 - 83.
Miscarriage of jstice.Sally Serena Ramage - 2017 - Criminal Law News 105:02-28.
Legal Obligation & Its Limits.Emad H. Atiq - 2019 - Law and Philosophy 38 (2):109-147.
The perceptive judge.Iris van Domselaar - 2018 - Jurisprudence 9 (1):71-87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
4 (#1,624,302)

6 months
1 (#1,471,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references