David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):573-587 (2000)
During human evolutionary history, there were “trade-offs” between expending time and energy on child-rearing and mating, so both men and women evolved conditional mating strategies guided by cues signaling the circumstances. Many short-term matings might be successful for some men; others might try to find and keep a single mate, investing their effort in rearing her offspring. Recent evidence suggests that men with features signaling genetic benefits to offspring should be preferred by women as short-term mates, but there are trade-offs between a mate's genetic fitness and his willingness to help in child-rearing. It is these circumstances and the cues that signal them that underlie the variation in short- and long-term mating strategies between and within the sexes. Key Words: conditional strategies; evolutionary psychology; fluctuating asymmetry; mating; reproductive strategies; sexual selection.
|Keywords||conditional strategies evolutionary psychology fluctuating asymmetry mating reproductive strategies sexual selection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Evan Charney (2012). Behavior Genetics and Postgenomics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):331-358.
John Klasios (2014). The Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mating: A Response to Buller's Critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:1-11.
Armin W. Schulz (2014). Niche Construction, Adaptive Preferences, and the Differences Between Fitness and Utility. Biology and Philosophy 29 (3):315-335.
Willem E. Frankenhuis & Annemie Ploeger (2007). Evolutionary Psychology Versus Fodor: Arguments for and Against the Massive Modularity Hypothesis. Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):687 – 710.
Jacob M. Vigil, David C. Geary & Jennifer Byrd-Craven (2006). Trade-Offs in Low-Income Women's Mate Preferences. Human Nature 17 (3):319-336.
Similar books and articles
David M. Buss (2005). Sex Differences in the Design Features of Socially Contingent Mating Adaptations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):278-279.
John Archer & Mani Mehdikhani (2000). Strategic Pluralism: Men and Women Start From a Different Point. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):588-588.
Michael R. Cunningham (2000). Adaptive Flexibility, Testosterone, and Mating Fitness: Are Low FA Individuals the Pinnacle of Evolution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):599-600.
Klaus Jaffe (1999). On the Adaptive Value of Some Mate Selection Strategies. Acta Biotheoretica 47 (1):29-40.
R. Elisabeth Cornwell, Craig T. Palmer & Hasker P. Davis (2000). More Women (and Men) That Never Evolved. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):598-599.
Elizabeth M. Hill (2000). Conditional Mating Strategies Are Contingent on Return From Investment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):605-606.
Steven Mithen (2000). Evolution of Mating Strategies: Evidence From the Fossil and Archaeological Records. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):615-616.
April L. Bleske & David M. Buss (2000). A Comprehensive Theory of Human Mating Must Explain Between-Sex and Within-Sex Differences in Mating Strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):593-594.
Stephen Beckerman (2000). Mating and Marriage, Husbands and Lovers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):590-591.
Steven W. Gangestad & Jeffry A. Simpson (2000). Trade-Offs, the Allocation of Reproductive Effort, and the Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):624-636.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #102,719 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #66,646 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?