A Problem for the Christian Mystical Doxastic Practice

Philo 13 (1):23-28 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

William Alston has identified what he calls a “Christian Mystical Practice” as one of the many doxastic practices in which humans engage. He defends CMP as being as rational as other doxastic practices, including the sense perceptual practice, having its own input and output rules, and its own background overrider system. I argue that there seems to be a serious problem with Alston’s characterization of the overrider system for CMP. The presence of this problem threatens to damage Alston’s argument for the rationality of engaging in the Christian Mystical Practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Alston’s Practical Rationality Argument.Michael B. Wakoff - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:247-284.
Why Alston’s Mystical Doxastic Practice Is Subjective. [REVIEW]Richard M. Gale - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):869 - 875.
Perceiving God and Realism.Peter Byrne - 2000 - Philo 3 (2):74-88.
A "doxastic practice" approach to epistemology.William P. Alston - 1989 - In Marjorie Clay & Keith Lehrer (eds.), Knowledge and Skepticism. Westview Press. pp. 1--29.
Jean Paul Sartre: The Mystical Atheist.Jerome Gellman - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):127 - 137.
Doxastic Voluntarism: A Sceptical Defence.Danny Frederick - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (1):24-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
52 (#306,373)

6 months
7 (#430,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references