David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (3):253-276 (2005)
The question posed in the title of this paper is an historical one. I am not, for example, primarily interested in the term 'Platonism' as used by modern philosophers to stand for a particular theory under discussion – a theory, which it is typically acknowledged, no one may have actually held.1 I am rather concerned to understand and articulate on an historical basis the core position of that 'school' of thought prominent in antiquity from the time of the 'founder' up until at least the middle of the 6th century C.E.2 Platonism was unquestionably the dominant philosophical position in the ancient world over a period of more than 800 years. Epicureanism is perhaps the sole major exception to the rule that in the ancient world all philosophers took Platonism as the starting-point for speculation, including those who thought their first task was to refute Platonism. Basically, Platonism sent the ancient philosophical agenda. Given this fact, understanding with some precision the nature of Platonism is obviously a desirable thing for the historian of ancient philosophy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John H. Spencer (2007). Defending Realism: Reflections on Karl Rogers's Metaphysics of Experimental Physics. Journal of Critical Realism 6 (1):126-147.
Similar books and articles
Harold Tarrant (1985). Scepticism or Platonism?: The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy. Cambridge University Press.
Greg Restall (2003). Just What is Full-Blooded Platonism? Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):82--91.
Alex Long (2009). Platonism and Stoicism (M.) Bonazzi, (C.) Helmig (Edd.) Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism. The Dialogue Between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. (Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, Series I, 39.) Pp. Xvi + 310. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2007. Cased, €69.50. ISBN: 978-90-5867-625-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (02):386-.
Øystein Linnebo (2008). The Nature of Mathematical Objects. In Bonnie Gold & Roger Simons (eds.), Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America. 205--219.
Jussi Haukioja (2005). A Middle Position Between Meaning Finitism and Meaning Platonism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (1):35 – 51.
Mary Leng (2005). Platonism and Anti-Platonism: Why Worry? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):65 – 84.
Mark Balaguer, Platonism in Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Øystein Linnebo (2009). Platonism in the Philosophy of Mathematics. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mark Balaguer (1998). Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #31,744 of 1,140,280 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #142,694 of 1,140,280 )
How can I increase my downloads?