David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Brain and Mind 1 (2):223-228 (2000)
What follows raises objections to some arguments that claimthat a principle of applicability of ordinary pain talkconstrains developments in the pain sciences. A more apt pictureof lay use of pain language shows its non-theoretic character.Since instrumentalism and eliminativism are philosophical viewsabout the status of theories of pain, neither is a threatto clinical use of standard pain lingo. Perfected pain theoryis likely to enhance and improve pain language in clinicalsettings, should such theory find its way into popular ideasand talk of pain.
|Keywords||Folk Pain Science Utility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Irwin Goldstein (1983). Pain and Masochism. Journal of Value Inquiry 17 (3):219-223.
Yutaka Nakamura & C. Chapman (2002). Constructing Pain: How Pain Hurts. In Kunio Yasue, Marj Jibu & Tarcisio Della Senta (eds.), No Matter, Never Mind. John Benjamins.
Rohini Terry, Eric E. Brodie & Catherine A. Niven (2007). Exploring the Phenomenology of Memory for Pain: Is Previously Experienced Acute Pain Consciously Remembered or Simply Known? Journal of Pain 8 (6):467-475.
Nico H. Frijda (2002). What is Pain Facial Expression For? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):460-460.
Peter Alward (2004). Mad, Martian, but Not Mad Martian Pain. Sorites 15 (December):73-75.
Donald F. Gustafson (2000). Our Choice Between Actual and Remembered Pain and Our Flawed Preferences. Philosophical Psychology 13 (1):111-119.
Donald F. Gustafson (1998). Pain, Qualia, and the Explanatory Gap. Philosophical Psychology 11 (3):371-387.
C. R. Chapman, Y. Nakakura & C. N. Chapman (2000). Pain and Folk Theory. Brain and Mind 1 (2):209-222.
D. Resnik (2000). Pain as a Folk Psychological Concept: A Clinical Perspective. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 1 (2):193-207.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #67,335 of 1,692,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #47,729 of 1,692,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?