David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Episteme 1 (1):35-48 (2004)
Nobody seriously doubts the possibility, or the usefulness, of finding things out; that is something we all take for granted when we inquire about our plane schedule, the state of our bank account, the best treatment for our child's illness, and so forth – a presupposition of the most ordinary, everyday looking into things as well as of the most sophisticated scientific research, not to mention of the legal system. Of course, nobody seriously doubts, either, that sometimes, instead of really looking into things, people fake, fudge, and obfuscate to avoid discovering unpalatable truths or having to give up comfortable tenets; that is something we all take for granted when we ask who paid for a reassuring study, who stands to gain from an Official Inquiry, which party an expert witness works for, and so on.Of late, however, radical feminists, multiculturalists, sociologists and rhetoricians of science, and a good many philosophers as well – though they look into questions about their plane schedules, bank accounts, medical treatments, etc., just like everyone else – profess to have seen through what the rest of us take for granted
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. V. Quine (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press.
Helen E. Longino (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.
Willard van Orman Quine (1996). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press.
Richard Rorty (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press.
Sandra G. Harding (1988). [Book Review] the Science Question in Feminism. [REVIEW] Feminist Studies 14 (1):561-574.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sébastien Charles (1998). Between Dogmatism and Relativism. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):38-45.
Baron Reed (2002). How to Think About Fallibilism. Philosophical Studies 107 (2):143-157.
James H. Turner & Sean R. Valentine (2001). Cynicism as a Fundamental Dimension of Moral Decision-Making: A Scale Development. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 34 (2):123 - 136.
Norbert Herold (1984). The Cynicism of Diogenes and the Concept of Cynicism. Philosophy and History 17 (1):27-29.
David Mazella (2007). The Making of Modern Cynicism. University of Virginia Press.
Samantha Vice, Cynicism and Morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.
Anthony Brueckner (2005). Fallibilism, Underdetermination, and Skepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):384–391.
Boris Rähme (2007). Fallibilism, Factivity and Epistemically Truth-Guaranteeing Justification. In Nils Gilje & Harald Grimen (eds.), Discursive Modernity. Universitetsforlaget
Jason Stanley (2005). Fallibilism and Concessive Knowledge Attributions. Analysis 65 (286):126–131.
Elizabeth F. Cooke (2003). Peirce, Fallibilism, and the Science of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):158-175.
Added to index2010-07-11
Total downloads53 ( #64,560 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?