Graduate studies at Western
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):232-250 (2009)
|Abstract||I criticize an increasingly popular set of arguments for the justifiability of punishment. Some philosophers try to justify punishment by appealing to what Peter Strawson calls the reactive attitudes – emotions like resentment, indignation, remorse and guilt. These arguments fail. The view that these emotions commit us to punishment rests on unsophisticated views of punishment and of these emotions and their associated behaviors. I offer more sophisticated accounts of punishment, of these emotions and of their associated behaviors that are consistent with Abolitionism, the view that punishment is unjustified.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Oliver O'Donovan (1977). Measure for Measure: Justice in Punishment and the Sentence of Death. Grove Books.
Jeremy Bentham (2009). The Rationale of Punishment. Prometheus Books.
Nathan Hanna (2008). Say What? A Critique of Expressive Retributivism. Law and Philosophy 27 (2):123-150.
David Wood (2010). Punishment: The Future. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):483-491.
Ido Weijers (2000). Punishment and Upbringing: Considerations for an Educative Justification of Punishment. Journal of Moral Education 29 (1):61-73.
J. Angelo Corlett (2001). Making Sense of Retributivism. Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
David Wood (2010). Punishment: Consequentialism. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads117 ( #5,721 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?