Why Searle has not rediscovered the mind

Journal of Consciousness Studies 1 (2):264-274 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a review article about John Searle's most recent book The Rediscovery of the Mind, which criticizes it for not going far enough in its departure from orthodox materialistic views of the brain and mind. It argues that Searle's two central propositions, consciousness is irreducible and consciousness cannot cause anything that cannot be explained by the causal behaviour of neurons, are incompatible; and suggests that it is reasonable and scientifically respectable to reject the latter rather than the former

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Searle rediscovers what was not lost.Tim Kenyon - 1998 - Dialogue 37 (1):117-130.
Searle on rediscovering the mind.Robert G. Burton - 1995 - Man and World 28 (2):163-174.
Mental Causation and Searle’s Impossible Conception of Unconscious Intentionality.Anthonie W. M. Meijers - 2000 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (2):155-170.
Searle on consciousness and dualism.Corbin Collins - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1):15-33.
Searle's chinese room argument.Larry Hauser - unknown - Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Is the mind conscious, functional, or both?Max Velmans - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):629-630.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#376,851)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references