Jones, S. (2018) 'Preserved for Posterity? Present Bias and the Status of Grindhouse Films in the " Home Cinema " Era', Journal of Film and Video, 70:1.

Journal of Film and Video 70 (1) (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite the closure of virtually all original grindhouse cinemas, ‘grindhouse’ lives on as a conceptual term. This article contends that the prevailing conceptualization of ‘grindhouse’ is problematized by a widening gap between the original grindhouse context (‘past’) and the DVD/home-viewing context (present). Despite fans’ and filmmakers’ desire to preserve this part of exploitation cinema history, the world of the grindhouse is now little more than a blurry set of tall-tales and faded phenomenal experiences, which are subject to present-bias. The continuing usefulness of grindhouse-qua-concept requires that one should pay heed to the contemporary contexts in which ‘grindhouse’ is evoked.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Film-Philosophy? Round Table.David Martin-Jones - 2010 - Film-Philosophy 14 (1):81 mins.
Towards a Theory of Film Worlds.Daniel Yacavone - 2008 - Film-Philosophy 12 (2):83-108.
Motion(less) Pictures: The Cinema of Stasis.J. Remes - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (3):257-270.
Art-house cinema, avant-garde film, and dramatic modernism.Bert Cardullo - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (2):1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-02

Downloads
553 (#32,614)

6 months
128 (#29,970)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steve Jones
University of Northumbria at Newcastle

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references