Two liberal fallacies in the hate crimes debate

Law and Philosophy 20 (2):175 - 193 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Messages, motives, and hate crimes.Frederick Schauer - 1992 - Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):52-54.
Making Room for Hate Crime Legislation in Liberal Societies.Mohamad Al-Hakim - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):341-358.
Are Hate Crimes Conceptually Distinct From Other Crimes?George Schedler - 2000 - Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (1):189-195.
Three fallacies.Jonathan E. Adler - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):665-666.
Two liberal fallacies in the hate crimes debate.M. D. - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (2):175-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#386,790)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan M. Kahan
Yale University

Citations of this work

Punishing hate and achieving equality.David M. Adams - 2005 - Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1):19-30.
A feminist liberal approach to hate crime legislation.Amy R. Baehr - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1):134–152.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Forgiveness and Resentment.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 1982 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1):503-516.
Two Liberal Fallacies in the Hate Crimes Debate.Dan M. Kahan - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (2):175-193.

Add more references