Attention: a descriptive taxonomy

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (4):1-27 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term attention has been used to mean so many different things that some have despaired of it being useful at all. This paper is devoted to bringing a modicum of order to the chaos through the time-honored device of categorization. The chief purpose of this paper is to introduce a comprehensive descriptive taxonomy of the nuanced ways the term attention may be employed. It is presented in table form, followed by elucidations and illustrations of each of its items. But first, I offer reasons why a taxonomy of attention is needed and explore some of its possible benefits. After presenting the taxonomy, I sketch by way of example how it might be applied to two interesting questions: is the umbrella term attention still useful?; and, what is it that ties the subdefinitions of attention together yet distinguishes them from other kinds of cognition?

Similar books and articles

A Function-Centered Taxonomy of Visual Attention.Ronald A. Rensink - 2015 - In Paul Coates & Sam Coleman (eds.), Phenomenal Qualities: Sense, Perception, and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 347-375.
Taxonomy and conservation science: interdependent and value-laden.Stijn Conix - 2019 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 41 (2):15.
Principles of Animal Taxonomy.George Gaylord Simpson - 1961 - Columbia University Press.
Charlesworth on Philosophy and Religion.Graham Oppy - 2019 - In Peter Wong, Sherah Bloor, Patrick Hutchings & Purushottama Bilimoria (eds.), Considering Religions, Rights and Bioethics: For Max Charlesworth. Springer Verlag. pp. 219-232.
What, If Anything, is a Higher Taxon?Kristin Conrad Guyot - 1987 - Dissertation, Cornell University

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-16

Downloads
463 (#41,818)

6 months
201 (#13,688)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Antonios Kaldas
Sydney College of Divinity

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
The Principles of Psychology.William James - 1890 - London, England: Dover Publications.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness.Bernard J. Baars - 1988 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 82 references / Add more references