What Slaveholders Think: How Contemporary Perpetrators Rationalize What They Do, by Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick: New York: Columbia University Press, 2017

Human Rights Review 20 (4):489-491 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Symposium on J. L. Austin. [REVIEW]J. B. R. - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (4):756-756.
Symposium on J. L. Austin. [REVIEW]R. J. B. - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (4):756-756.
Essays on Austin. [REVIEW]S. C. A. - 1974 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (1):118-119.
Philosophical papers.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock.
Original sin or original sinfulness? A comment.Simon Heans - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (1):55-69.
Reading Austin Rhetorically.Andrew Munro - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (1):22-43.
Shame, violence, and perpetrators' voices.Nancy Nyquist Potter - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):237-237.
Austin on Perception, Knowledge and Meaning.Krista Lawlor - 2017 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Interpreting J. L. Austin: Critical Essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Typology of perpetrators of domestic violence.Danuta Rode - 2010 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 41 (1):36-45.
Modernism and the Grounds of Law.Peter Fitzpatrick - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-20

Downloads
12 (#1,109,269)

6 months
5 (#702,332)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references