Significance, evidence, and the uncomfortable science of fMRI

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (or fMRI)1 is widely used to support hypotheses about brain function. Many find the images produced from fMRI data to be especially compelling evidence for scientific hypotheses [McCabe and Castel, 2008]. There are many problems with all of this; I want to start with two of them, and argue that they get us closer to an under-appreciated worry about many imaging experiments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#262,036)

6 months
1 (#1,470,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Colin Klein
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references