|Abstract||Functional magnetic resonance imaging (or fMRI)1 is widely used to support hypotheses about brain function. Many find the images produced from fMRI data to be especially compelling evidence for scientific hypotheses [McCabe and Castel, 2008]. There are many problems with all of this; I want to start with two of them, and argue that they get us closer to an under-appreciated worry about many imaging experiments.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Kim Celone & Chantal Stern (2009). A Neuroimaging Perspective on the Use of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) in Educational and Legal Systems. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):28 – 29.
Allyson C. Rosen (2009). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) in the Classroom. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):30 – 31.
Zoe Kourtzi & Mark Augath, Integration of Local Features Into Global Shapes: Monkey and Human fMRI Studies.
Dan Lloyd (2002). Studying the Mind From the Inside Out. Brain and Mind 3 (1):243-59.
Caitlin M. Connors & Ilina Singh (2009). What We Should Really Worry About in Pediatric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri). American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):16 – 18.
Andreas Bartels, fMRI and its Interpretations: An Illustration on Directional Selectivity in Area V5/MT.
Amy E. White (2010). The Lie of Fmri: An Examination of the Ethics of a Market in Lie Detection Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. HEC Forum 22 (3):253-266.
Colin Klein (2010). Philosophical Issues in Neuroimaging. Philosophy Compass 5 (2):186-198.
Colin Klein (2010). Images Are Not the Evidence in Neuroimaging. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):265-278.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #16,371 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?