Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):271-289 (1997)
|Abstract||The best-interests standard is a widely used ethical, legal, and social basis for policy and decision-making involving children and other incompetent persons. It is under attack, however, as self-defeating, individualistic, unknowable, vague, dangerous, and open to abuse. The author defends this standard by identifying its employment, first, as a threshold for intervention and judgment (as in child abuse and neglect rulings), second, as an ideal to establish policies or prima facie duties, and, third, as a standard of reasonableness. Criticisms of the best-interests standard are reconsidered after clarifying these different meanings|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James J. Brummer (1986). Accountability and the Restraint of Freedom: A Deontological Case for the Stricter Standard of Corporate Disclosure. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 5 (2):155 - 164.
Douglas Diekema (2004). Parental Refusals of Medical Treatment: The Harm Principle as Threshold for State Intervention. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
Loretta M. Kopelman & Arthur E. Kopelman (2007). Using a New Analysis of the Best Interests Standard to Address Cultural Disputes: Whose Data, Which Values? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):373-391.
Loretta M. Kopelman (2005). Rejecting the Baby Doe Rules and Defending a "Negative" Analysis of the Best Interests Standard. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):331 – 352.
Alan Wertheimer (2013). Is Payment a Benefit? Bioethics 27 (2):105-116.
Loretta M. Kopelman (2007). Using the Best Interests Standard to Decide Whether to Test Children for Untreatable, Late-Onset Genetic Diseases. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):375 – 394.
Susan Dimock (2008). Reasonable Women in the Law. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):153-175.
Pauline Kleingeld (2004). Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant’s Defence of a League of States and His Ideal of a World Federation. European Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):304-325.
L. M. Kopelman (1997). Children and Bioethics: Uses and Abuses of the Best-Interests Standard. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):213-217.
Bekka Williams (2013). The Agent-Relative Probability Threshold of Hope. Ratio 26 (2):179-195.
Loretta M. Kopelman (2007). The Best Interests Standard for Incompetent or Incapacitated Persons of All Ages. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (1):187-196.
Rieke van der Graaf & Johannes J. M. van Delden (2009). What is the Best Standard for the Standard of Care in Clinical Research? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):35 – 43.
James Hawthorne (2007). Nonmonotonic Conditionals That Behave Like Conditional Probabilities Above a Threshold. Journal of Applied Logic 5 (4):625-637.
Rui Nunes & Guilhermina Rego (forthcoming). Priority Setting in Health Care: A Complementary Approach. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis:1-12.
Added to index2012-04-07
Total downloads3 ( #213,130 of 722,771 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,771 )
How can I increase my downloads?