Comparative study on self-transcendence : Paul Tillich and Masao Abe

Abstract

This thesis is an attempt to explore the meanings of self-transcendence, which, in fact, is one of the most basic and important concepts of Buddhism and Christianity. It runs through not only the theme of soteriology, but also the study of the interrelationship of human beings, the ultimate reality and the mundane society. In approaching such a crucial and complicated notion, it would be impossible for me to examine the two religions as a whole. Thus, I will narrow the scope of my discussion in light of the two contemporary influential dialogical scholars, Paul Tillich and Masao Abe, both of whom have made much contribution on the issue. In the introduction, definitions, aims and objectives concerning this thesis would be given, so that one might get a general picture of what I intend to write. Then, discussion of Abe's and Tillich's views on "self" would be provided in Chapter One. In the second Chapter, focus will be put on the examination of the concept of "transcendence", which is considered to be the ontological ground for self-transcendence. In Chapter Three, I will investigate the two different modes of self-transcendence, which philosophers Yu Ying-shih and Tang Yijie recently have portrayed. They claimed that Buddhism, Zen in particular, is a religion of internal transcendence; whereas Christianity is a religion of external transcendence. Considering these categorizations, I would argue how the latter one is relatively acceptable from the theoretical point of view. In the fourth Chapter, I will address to the pragmatic implications of self-transcendence. It is my belief that religion, in its very end is a matter of morality or social ethics. Ontology is only the metaphysical ground of axiology. I will try to examine how the above two elements are related to each other and its significant implications to our daily life. I hope this thesis would be a good attempt to conduct a Buddhist-Christian dialogue in accordance with the concept of self-transcendence, in which certain differences and affinities towards the interpretations of self, the ultimate reality and morality would be analyzed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Religion without transcendence?Dewi Zephaniah Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.) - 1997 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
Transcendence without reality.John R. Wright - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (3):361-384.
What Does Heidegger Mean by the Transcendence of Dasein?Dermot Moran - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (4):491-514.
The rothko chapel paintings and the 'urgency of the transcendent experience'.Wessel Stoker - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (2):89 - 102.
Divine Transcendence.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1984 - Religious Studies 20 (3):377 - 387.
The Paradox and Limits of Michel Henry’s Concept of Transcendence.Jean-François Lavigne - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (3):377-388.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-02

Downloads
21 (#734,423)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references