- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Biological versus social psychological bases of mate selection
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):103-104 (1992)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Top-down versus bottom-up is not the same thing as psychological versus biological.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):585-586.
The units of selection and the bases of selection.David Walton - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):417-435.
Sex and Age Differences in Mate-Selection Preferences.Sascha Schwarz & Manfred Hassebrauck - 2012 - Human Nature 23 (4):447-466.
Sexual selection and mate choice in evolutionary psychology.Chris Haufe - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (1):115-128.
Psychological altruism vs. biological altruism: Narrowing the gap with the Baldwin effect.Mahesh Ananth - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (3):217-239.
Mate preference is not mate selection.Ada Zohar & Ruth Guttman - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (1):38-39.
The evolutionary psychology of mate selection in Morocco.Alex Walter - 1997 - Human Nature 8 (2):113-137.
On the adaptive value of some mate selection strategies.Klaus Jaffe - 1999 - Acta Biotheoretica 47 (1):29-40.
Beyond the Sociobiological Dilemma: Social Emotions and the Evolution of Morality.Alejandro Rosas - 2007 - Zygon 42 (3):685-700.
Morality and ‘Unto Others': Response to commentary discussion.Elliott Sober & David Sloan Wilson - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):257-268.
Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies.Douglas T. Kenrick & Richard C. Keefe - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):75-91.
Response to “MHC‐dependent mate choice in humans: Why genomic patterns from the HapMap European American data set support the hypothesis” (DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100150). [REVIEW]Adnan Derti & Frederick P. Roth - 2012 - Bioessays 34 (7):576-577.
The misuse of Sober's selection for/selection of distinction.R. Goode & P. E. Griffiths - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (1):99-108.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
31 (#513,686)
6 months
15 (#164,728)
2014-01-20
Downloads
31 (#513,686)
6 months
15 (#164,728)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Gender and sexual orientation: Why the different age preferences?Douglas T. Kenrick & Richard C. Keefe - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):582-584.
Individual differences in age preferences in mates.Niels G. Waller - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):578-581.
Individual differences in mating strategies.David M. Buss - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):581-582.
References found in this work
The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1898 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-g9b9l uwo