David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 31 (2):193 – 215 (1988)
Grünbaum characterizes the foundations of psychoanalysis as consisting primarily of two assertions ? (1) only psychoanalysis can give correct insight into the unconscious causes of neurosis, and (2) only such correct insight can cure neurosis. Grünbaum infers from these that therapeutic success is the only evidence of the correctness of psychoanalytic theories. It is obvious that the two passages in Freud on which Grünbaum relies do not justify his interpretation. Furthermore, Freud thought of therapeutic success as by no means the only kind of relevant and available evidence for psychoanalytic theory. In a discussion of Grünbaum's critique of Freud's theory concerning the causation of slips of the tongue, it is argued that Grünbaum is committed to mistaken views on the nature of causation in psychology and wholly neglects the important role of analogical thinking not only in psychology but in science generally
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Adolf Grünbaum (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. University of California Press.
Adolf Grunbaum (1980). Epistemological Liabilities of the Clinical Appraisal of Psychoanalytic Theory. Noûs 14 (3):307-385.
Adolf Grünbaum (1980). Epistemological Liabilities of the Clinical Appraisal of Psychoanalytic Theory. Noûs 14 (3):307 - 385.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Donald Levy (1996). Freud Among the Philosophers: The Psychoanalytic Unconscious and its Philosophical Critics. Yale University Press.
Athony A. Derksen (2001). The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: A Look Into Freud's Rhetorical Tool Box. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):329-350.
Adolf Grunbaum (1996). Empirical Evaluations of Theoretical Explanations of Psychotherapeutic Efficacy: A Reply to John D. Greenwood. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):622-641.
Adolf Grunbaum (1987). Psychoanalysis and Theism. The Monist 70 (2):152 - 192.
James D. Marshall (2008). Wittgenstein, Freud, Dreaming and Education: Psychoanalytic Explanation as 'Une Façon de Parler'. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (5):606-620.
A. A. Derksen (1992). Does the Tally Argument Make Freud a Sophisticated Methodologist? Philosophy of Science 59 (1):75-101.
Margaret Nash (1989). Gr Nbaum and Psychoanalysis. Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):325 – 343.
Kathleen Emmett (1989). Slips of the Tongue. Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):203-222.
Robert C. Richardson (1990). The "Tally Argument" and the Validation of Psychoanalysis. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):668-676.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads7 ( #402,668 of 1,790,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,637 of 1,790,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?