David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sympsium. Canadian Journal for Continental Philosophy 13 (1):59-73 (2009)
In this paper I shall present an argument against Deleuze’s philosophy of painting. Deleuze’s main thesis in Logic of Sensation is twofold:  he claims that painting is based on a non-representational level; and  he claims that this level comes out of the materiality of painting. I shall claim that Deleuze’s theses should be rejected for the following reasons: first, the difference between non-intentional life and the representational world is too strict. I submit that the non-intentional relation that painting opens up is itself part of and emerges out of the representational force of painting. If this would not be the case, then the criterion for differentiating between paintings and other objects cannot be developed. Indeed, Deleuze fails to give us a criterion. Second, Deleuze’s way of dealing with materiality in painting remains unsatisfactory, insofar as he is unable to take into account how materiality is charged with an “attitude towards the world.” In sum, materiality can only be painting’s materiality if we understand it as being formed and disclosed in representation.
|Keywords||Deleuze painting aesthetics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christian Lotz (2009). Representation or Sensation? A Critique of Deleuze’s Philosophy of Painting. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 13 (1):59-72.
Bram Ieven (2011). Deleuze Modernist. Deleuze Studies 5 (1):84-96.
Vlad Ionescu (2011). Deleuze's Tensive Notion of Painting in the Light of Riegl, Wöölfflin and Worringer. Deleuze Studies 5 (1):52-62.
Tomas Geyskens (2008). Painting as Hysteria: Deleuze on Bacon. Deleuze Studies 2 (2):140-154.
Colin Gardner (2012). Barnett Newman's Zip as Figure. Deleuze Studies 6 (1):42-54.
Stephen Zepke (2005). Art as Abstract Machine: Ontology and Aesthetics in Deleuze and Guattari. Routledge.
Darren Ambrose (2006). Deleuze, Philosophy, and the Materiality of Painting. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 10 (1):191-211.
Deleuze & Prehistoric Painting (2006). 30,000 Bc: Painting Animality. Angelaki 11 (2):137 – 152.
Judy Purdom, Thinking in Painting : Gilles Deleuze and the Revolution From Representation to Abstraction.
Nigel Wentworth (2004). The Phenomenology of Painting. Cambridge University Press.
Véronique Marion Fóti (ed.) (1996). Merleau-Ponty: Difference, Materiality, Painting. Humanities Press.
Andrew Benjamin (2011). On the Image of Painting. Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):181-205.
Lorna Collins (2008). Sensations Spill a Deluge Over the Figure. Deleuze Studies 2 (1):49-73.
Added to index2011-01-25
Total downloads14 ( #170,159 of 1,699,706 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #77,273 of 1,699,706 )
How can I increase my downloads?