Representation or Sensation? A Critique of Deleuze’s Philosophy of Painting

In this paper I shall present an argument against Deleuze’s philosophy of painting. Deleuze’s main thesis in Logic of Sensation is twofold: [1] he claims that painting is based on a non-representational level; and [2] he claims that this level comes out of the materiality of painting. I shall claim that Deleuze’s theses should be rejected for the following reasons: first, the difference between non-intentional life and the representational world is too strict. I submit that the non-intentional relation that painting opens up is itself part of and emerges out of the representational force of painting. If this would not be the case, then the criterion for differentiating between paintings and other objects cannot be developed. Indeed, Deleuze fails to give us a criterion. Second, Deleuze’s way of dealing with materiality in painting remains unsatisfactory, insofar as he is unable to take into account how materiality is charged with an “attitude towards the world.” In sum, materiality can only be painting’s materiality if we understand it as being formed and disclosed in representation.
Keywords Deleuze  painting  aesthetics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/symposium20091314
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Christian Lotz (2009). Representation or Sensation? A Critique of Deleuze’s Philosophy of Painting. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 13 (1):59-72.
Bram Ieven (2011). Deleuze Modernist. Deleuze Studies 5 (1):84-96.
Darren Ambrose (2006). Deleuze, Philosophy, and the Materiality of Painting. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 10 (1):191-211.
Andrew Benjamin (2011). On the Image of Painting. Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):181-205.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #180,314 of 1,725,444 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #110,437 of 1,725,444 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.