Different perspectives on saving lives

Economics and Philosophy 23 (1):89-96 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In , John Broome defends a very weak consequentialist account of the value of saving lives. This paper challenges the commitments of this kind of account and describes some reasons for saving lives that would appeal to a non-consequentialist

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#680,480)

6 months
11 (#235,184)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas MacLean
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Should the numbers count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Innumerate ethics.Derek Parfit - 1978 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (4):285-301.
Can a Nonconsequentialist Count Lives?David Wasserman & Alan Strudler - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (1):71-94.

Add more references