Nonmonotonicity in the Framework of Parametric Logic

Studia Logica 107 (5):1025-1077 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Parametric logic is a framework that generalises classical first-order logic. A generalised notion of logical consequence—a form of preferential entailment based on a closed world assumption—is defined as a function of some parameters. A concept of possible knowledge base—the counterpart to the consistent theories of first-order logic—is introduced. The notion of compactness is weakened. The degree of weakening is quantified by a nonnull ordinal—the larger the ordinal, the more significant the weakening. For every possible knowledge base T, a hierarchy of sentences that are generalised logical consequences of T is built. The first layer of the hierarchies corresponds to sentences that can be obtained by a deductive inference, characterised by the compactness property. The second layer of the hierarchies corresponds to sentences that can be obtained by an inductive inference, characterised by the property of weak compactness quantified by 1. Weaker forms of compactness—quantified by nonnull ordinals—determine higher layers in the hierarchies, corresponding to more complex inferences. The naturalness of the hierarchies built over the possible knowledge bases is attested by fundamental connections with notions from Learning theory and from topology. The naturalness of the hierarchies built over the possible knowledge bases is attested by fundamental connections with notions from Learning theory—classification in the limit, with or without a bounded number of mind changes—and from topology—in reference to the Borel and the difference hierarchies. In this paper, we introduce the key model-theoretic aspects of Parametric logic, justify the concept of the knowledge base, define the hierarchies of generalised logical consequences and illustrate their relevance to Nonmonotonic reasoning. More specifically, we show that the degree of nonmonotonicity that is required to infer a sentence can be characterised by the least nonnull ordinal that quantifies the weakening of compactness used to locate the inferred sentence in the hierarchies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arity hierarchies.Martin Grohe - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 82 (2):103-163.
Approximation methods in inductive inference.William R. Moser - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 93 (1-3):217-253.
Hierarchical logical consequence.Carlos Caleiro, Paula Gouveia & Jaime Ramos - 2011 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 19 (4):544-565.
Compactness in first order Łukasiewicz logic.N. Tavana, M. Pourmahdian & F. Didehvar - 2012 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (1):254-265.
Fine hierarchies and Boolean terms.V. L. Selivanov - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):289-317.
Long Borel hierarchies.Arnold W. Miller - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (3):307-322.
Hierarchies in φ‐spaces and applications.Victor L. Selivanov - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (1):45-61.
Logical problems with nonmonotonicity.Piotr Łukowski - 2014 - Logic and Logical Philosophy (2):171-188.
Syntactic Preservation Theorems for Intuitionistic Predicate Logic.Jonathan Fleischmann - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (2):225-245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-10

Downloads
18 (#826,732)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A logic for default reasoning.Ray Reiter - 1980 - Artificial Intelligence 13 (1-2):81-137.
Logic programming as classical inference.Eric A. Martin - 2015 - Journal of Applied Logic 13 (3):316-369.

Add more references