- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Challenge for New Defenders of the Doctrine of Double Effect
Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (3):1-7 (2010)
Abstract
No abstract.Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Challenge for New Defenders of the Doctrine of Double Effect.Mark McBride - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (August, 6 Pages).
Intentions, foreseen consequences and the doctrine of double effect.Alison Hills - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (2):257 - 283.
Four versions of double effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
Eight Arguments against Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - forthcoming - In Proceedings of the XXIII. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Philosophie.
Intentions, motives and the doctrine of double effect.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):567-585.
The Secret to the Success of the Doctrine of Double Effect : Biased Framing, Inadequate Methodology, and Clever Distractions.Uwe Steinhoff - 2018 - The Journal of Ethics 22 (3-4):235-263.
The Doctrine of Double Effect and the Question of Constraints on Business Decisions.Patrick A. Tully - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):51-63.
Deadly Drugs and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Reply to Tully.Lawrence Masek - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):143-151.
Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
The Theoretical Tenability of the Doctrine of Double Effect.T. J. Bole - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):467-473.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-11-03
Downloads
26 (#605,520)
6 months
14 (#174,791)
2018-11-03
Downloads
26 (#605,520)
6 months
14 (#174,791)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect.Philippa Foot - 1967 - Oxford Review 5:5-15.
Actions, intentions, and consequences: The doctrine of double effect.Warren S. Quinn - 1989 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (4):334-351.
Index.T. M. Scanlon - 2008 - In Thomas Scanlon (ed.), Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. pp. 243-247.
Double-effect reasoning: doing good and avoiding evil.T. A. Cavanaugh - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-gf2vn uwo