On "seeing" the truth of the Godel sentence

Facta Philosophica 3 (1):25-30 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5840/factaphil2001313

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On Gödel Sentences and What They Say.Peter Milne - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):193-226.
Deflationism and the gödel phenomena.Neil Tennant - 2002 - Mind 111 (443):551-582.
On Turing machines knowing their own gödel-sentences.Neil Tennant - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (1):72-79.
Consistency, Turing Computability and Gödel’s First Incompleteness Theorem.Robert F. Hadley - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (1):1-15.
The gödel paradox and Wittgenstein's reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.
Mathematics and the mind.Michael Redhead - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):731-737.
How do We Know that the Godel Sentence of a Consistent Theory Is True?G. Sereny - 2011 - Philosophia Mathematica 19 (1):47-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#423,461)

6 months
2 (#1,229,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Storrs McCall
McGill University

Citations of this work

McCall’s Gödelian Argument is Invalid.Panu Raatikainen - 2002 - Facta Philosophica 4 (1):167-69.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references