David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Glenn McGee (ed.)
Mit Press (2003)
Modern scientific and medical advances bring new complexity and urgency to ethical issues in health care and biomedical research. This book applies the American philosophical theory of pragmatism to such bioethics. Critics of pragmatism argue that it lacks a universal moral foundation. Yet it is this very lack of a metaphysical dividing line between facts and values that makes pragmatism such a rigorous and appropriate method for solving problems in bioethics. For pragmatism, ethics is a way of satisfying the complex demands of multiple individuals and groups in a contingent and changing world. Pragmatism also demands careful attention to the ways in which scientific advances change our values and ethics.The essays in this book present different approaches to pragmatism and different ways of applying pragmatism to scientific and medical matters. They use pragmatism to guide thinking about such timely topics as stem cell research, human cloning, genetic testing, human enhancement, and care for the poor and aging. This new edition contains three new chapters, on difficulties with applying pragmatism to law and bioethics, on helping people to die, and on embryonic stem cell research
|Keywords||Medical ethics Bioethics Medicine Philosophy Pragmatism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$3.00 new (87% off) $24.26 direct from Amazon (14% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||R725.5.P73 2003|
|ISBN(s)||0826513212 0262134306 9780262632720 0262632721|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Geoffrey Poitras & Lindsay Meredith (2009). Ethical Transparency and Economic Medicalization. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (3):313 - 325.
Tineke A. Abma, Bert Molewijk & Guy A. M. Widdershoven (2009). Good Care in Ongoing Dialogue. Improving the Quality of Care Through Moral Deliberation and Responsive Evaluation. Health Care Analysis 17 (3):217-235.
Similar books and articles
Warren A. Shibles (2010). The Philosophy and Practice of Medicine and Bioethics: A Naturalistic-Humanistic Approach. Springer.
Howard Brody (2009). The Future of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Emma Wray (2005). Book Review : McGee, Glenn, Ed. Pragmatic Bioethics, 2nd Ed. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2003. 309 Pp. $28.00 (Paper). ISBN 0-262-63272-. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):161-163.
Christopher Tollefsen (2000). What Would John Dewey Do? The Promises and Perils of Pragmatic Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):77 – 106.
Heike Schmidt-Felzmann (2003). Pragmatic Principles - Methodological Pragmatism in the Principle-Based Approach to Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):581 – 596.
Laurence B. McCullough (1986). Methodological Concerns in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):17-37.
Kenneth J. Ryan (2000). Glenn McGee, Bioethics and Pragmatism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (6):623-627.
Laurence B. McCullough (2002). Philosophical Challenges in Teaching Bioethics: The Importance of Professional Medical Ethics and its History for Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):395 – 402.
Elizabeth F. Cooke (2003). On the Possibility of a Pragmatic Discourse Bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and the Normative Logic of Bioethical Inquiry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):635 – 653.
D. Micah Hester (2003). Is Pragmatism Well-Suited to Bioethics? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):545 – 561.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #366,108 of 1,101,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #191,891 of 1,101,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?