Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):527–548 (2006)
|Abstract||Plato's discussion of women in the Republic is problematic. For one, arguments in Book V which purport to establish that women should guard and rule alongside men do not deliver the advertised conclusion. In addition, Plato asserts that women are "weaker in all pursuits" than men. Given this assumption, having women guard and rule seems inimical to the health, security, and goodness of the kallipolis. I argue that we best understand the inclusion of women by seeing how women's inclusion contributes to the civic unity of the kallipolis. I further argue that Plato's Laws reveals that (a) women will become more virtuous by doing similar jobs to men; and (b) women will be given lesser responsibilities than men in any polis approximating justice.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patricia Ward Scaltsas (1992). Virtue Without Gender in Socrates. Hypatia 7 (3):126 - 137.
Harry Brod (1987). The New Men's Studies: From Feminist Theory to Gender Scholarship. Hypatia 2 (1):179 - 196.
Catherine Kirchmeyer (2002). Gender Differences in Managerial Careers: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):5 - 24.
Mary Libertin (1987). The Politics of Women's Studies and Men's Studies. Hypatia 2 (2):143 - 152.
Rada Iveković (1993). Women, Nationalism and War: "Make Love Not War". Hypatia 8 (4):113 - 126.
Michael Shalom Kochin (2002). Gender and Rhetoric in Plato's Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Marshall I. Pomer (1983). Mobility of Women Into the Economic Mainstream. Journal of Business Ethics 2 (3):185 - 189.
Hugh LaFollette (1992). Real Men. In Larry May & Robert Strikwerda (eds.), Masculinity. Rowman and Littlefield.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #54,718 of 556,909 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,909 )
How can I increase my downloads?