David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Monist 93 (4):598-617 (2010)
Here is a dilemma concerning the history of science. Can the history of scientific thought be reduced to the history of the beliefs, motives and actions of scientists? Or should we think of the history of scientific thought as in some sense independent from the history of scientists? The aim of this paper is to carve out an intermediate position between these two. I will argue that the history of scientific thought supervenes on, but not reducible to, the history of scientists. There is a legitimate level of description for analyzing the history of scientific thought that does not reduce to the individual level of scientists. Yet, every aspect of the history of scientific thought is determined by the actual motives and actions of individual scientists. Maybe surprisingly, I use Imre Lakatos’s controversial concept of the rational reconstruction of the history of science in order to argue for this intermediate position.
|Keywords||Lakatos Rational reconstruction History of science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrés Rivadulla (1986). Empirismo Y Normatividad En Filosofía de la Ciencia. Theoria 1 (3):667-686.
Kuno Lorenz & Jürgen Mittelstrass (1967). On Rational Philosophy of Language: The Programme in Plato's Cratylus Reconsidered. Mind 76 (301):1-20.
William Demopoulos (2003). On the Rational Reconstruction of Our Theoretical Knowledge. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):371-403.
R. A. Duff (2009). Philosophy and 'the Life of the Law'. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):245-258.
Adrian-Paul Iliescu (1996). Rational Reconstruction: Preconditions and Limits. Theoria 11 (3):33-47.
Terrence Kelly (2001). Sociological Not Political: Rawls and the Reconstructive Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):3-19.
Adrian-Paul Iliescu (1996). Rational Reconstruction. Theoria 11 (3):33-47.
Janice L. Schultz (1996). An Abelardian Reconstruction Reconsidered. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 70 (2):275-286.
Eveline T. Feteris (2008). The Rational Reconstruction of Weighing and Balancing on the Basis of Teleological-Evaluative Considerations in the Justification of Judicial Decisions. Ratio Juris 21 (4):481-495.
Jørgen Pedersen (2008). Habermas' Method: Rational Reconstruction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):457-485.
Added to index2010-07-07
Total downloads39 ( #36,283 of 1,014,527 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #22,204 of 1,014,527 )
How can I increase my downloads?