The concept of chaos in contemporary science: On Jean Bricmont's critique of Ilya Prigogine's ideas [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Science 7 (4):465-479 (2002)
Nonclarity around the understandingof the concept of chaos has caused someconfusion in the contemporary natural science.For instance, not making a clear distinctionbetween the deterministic and quantum chaos hasmade it impossible to evaluate the approach ofIlya Prigogine in an appropriate way. It isshown that Jean Bricmont has missed the targetin his critique of I. Prigogine's ideas, as thelatter has concentrated his interest on systemsconsisting of infinite (arbitrarily large)number of particles in incessant mutualimpact, the former on systems that have afinite (not necessarily large, althoughsometimes very large) number of particles,which move freely of any mutual impact orparticipate only in transient interaction. Thedifference may sometimes be quite crucial. Itis also suggested that if we consider theirreversibility as the basic element ofdescription of physical world, the world oftrajectories and wave functions cannot beresearched apart from this real irreversibility.
|Keywords||deterministic chaos quantum chaos indeterminism irreversibility initial conditions large Poincaré systems thermodynamic limit|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Charles Smith (2005). Meeting a World in Crisis: On Unlearning, Fresh Perception and Alignment with Life's Fundamental Trend: A Tribute to C. West Churchman, Pir Vilayat Khan, and Ilya Prigogine. World Futures 61 (8):600 – 610.
Ave Mets & Piret Kuusk (2009). The Constructive Realist Account of Science and its Application to Ilya Prigogine's Conception of Laws of Nature. Foundations of Science 14 (3):239-248.
Guido Verstraeten (1991). Some Critical Remarks Concerning Prigogine's Conception of Temporal Irreversibility. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):639-654.
Ilya Prigogine (1994). Science, Reason and Passion. World Futures 40 (1):35-43.
Olimpia Lombardi (1999). EI Fin de la Omnisciencia: La Respuesta de Prigogine Al Problema de la Irreversibilidad (the End of Omniscience: Prigogine's Answer to the Problem of Irreversibility). Theoria 14 (3):489-510.
Joseph E. Earley (2006). Some Philosophical Influences on Ilya Prigogine's Statistical Mechanics. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (3):271-283.
Theodor Leiber (1997). On the Actual Impact of Deterministic Chaos. Synthese 113 (3):357-379.
Yvon Gauthier (2009). The Construction of Chaos Theory. Foundations of Science 14 (3):153-165.
Olimpia Lombardi (2012). Prigogine and the Many Voices of Nature. Foundations of Chemistry 14 (3):205-219.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #120,206 of 1,692,221 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #111,548 of 1,692,221 )
How can I increase my downloads?