David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):187-211 (2000)
In a comment on concupscentia, Rahner says that while we may properly draw a distinction between “the spiritual and the sensitive as between two really distinct powers of man,” we must recognize that no human power can be conceived as a “thing.” Given that caution, what would Rahner think of the Freudian “Id”—a word which Freud chose to characterize the nonhuman “it” (thing) at the base of human motivation? Not surprisingly, Rahner says that with the strength of faith we can see in the unconscious “the power of the Holy Ghost.”The essay at hand turns, then, to a significant anti-Freudian theorist, Julia Kristeva, who has developed an extended analysis of the meaningful structures of the psyche prior to the development of self-consciousness in the standard Freudian Oedipal scenario. In contrast to the law of the “castrating” Father who establishes the world of consciousness, of self and other: abstract self-consciousness and abstract signigcation, Kristeva holds out the realm of the Mother in which self andother are “one.” The paradigm of the realm of the Mother is not separation of self and other, but the fusion of self and other in the event of pregnancy. Kristeva’s metaphor of pregnancy is used as a comparison to the relation of God and the human. Prior to the thematic, self-conscious sense of self, there is an ontological relation of God and the human which is the foundation of self.Kristeva’ s realm of the mother constitutes a world of “body language.” The essay concludes with a discussion of the “positivity” of sexuality as body language. In so far as sex leads one back into the body, into “the sensitive” it opens up a realm of meaning that is fatally absent from the abstract self-consciousness produced by the Law of the Father
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrew J. Dell’Olio (1998). Why Not God the Mother? Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):193-209.
Alison Stone (2012). Against Matricide: Rethinking Subjectivity and the Maternal Body. Hypatia 27 (1):118-138.
Mary V. Maher (1992). Rahner on the Human Experience of God. Philosophy and Theology 7 (2):127-164.
Howard Ebert (1993). Immutability of God. Philosophy and Theology 8 (1):41-61.
Theresa Sanders (1994). Rest for the Restless? Philosophy and Theology 8 (4):347-362.
Gal Yehezkel (2008). Self-Consciousness, Objectivity, and Time. Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):591-611.
Denis Edwards (2006). Resurrection of the Body and Transformation of the Universe in the Theology of Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):357-383.
Nicholas Maxwell (2002). Cutting God in Half. Philosophy Now 35 (35):22-25.
Ewa Ziarek (1992). At the Limits of Discourse: Heterogeneity, Alterity, and the Maternal Body in Kristeva's Thought. Hypatia 7 (2):91 - 108.
David W. Meyers (1990). The Human Body and the Law. Stanford University Press.
Samuel M. Powell (2008). The World's Participation in God's Trinitarian Life. Process Studies 37 (1):145-165.
Angela Elrod-Sadler (2008). Forgiveness in the Works of Julia Kristeva. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:153-161.
Ilyas Altuner (2012). The Relation of God and Being in Descartes. Igdir University Journal of Social Sciences (2): 33-51.
Ellen Stansell (2010). Suturing the Body Corporate (Divine and Human) in the Brahmanic Traditions. Sophia 49 (2):237-259.
Charles Taliaferro (1996). Consciousness and the Mind of God. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?