David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):1-5 (2012)
Discussions on the role of participatory approaches in technology assessment and technology policy have a long history. While in the beginning this subject was handled mainly as a theoretical requirement for democratic governance of technology, active involvement of stakeholders and laypeople became popular in TA exercises throughout the 1980s. Since then, a variety of participatory TA (pTA) methods and strategies have been developed and widely used, raising further far-reaching expectations. It has been argued that participatory approaches might broaden and hence enrich the knowledge and value base in ongoing technological discourses and eventually improve the factual as well as democratic legitimacy of technology-related decisions (Joss and Bellucci 2002). Moreover, a stronger integration of diverse actors and stakeholders was linked to the promise of better socially embedded solutions, an increased acceptance and enhanced diffusion of technology as well as technology policy. However
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Saretzki (2012). Legitimation Problems of Participatory Processes in Technology Assessment and Technology Policy. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Yukio Wakamatsu (1999). A Citizens' Conference on Gene Therapy in Japan: A Feasibility Study of the Consensus Conference Method in Japan. [REVIEW] AI and Society 13 (1-2):22-43.
Leonhard Hennen (2012). Why Do We Still Need Participatory Technology Assessment? Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):27-41.
Karen Kastenhofer & Doris Allhutter (2010). Technoscience and Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):1-4.
Barbara Skorupinski (2002). Putting Precaution to Debate – About the Precautionary Principle and Participatory Technology Assessment. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):87-102.
Wolfgang Liebert & Jan C. Schmidt (2010). Towards a Prospective Technology Assessment: Challenges and Requirements for Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):99-116.
Barbara Skorupinski & Konrad Ott (2002). Technology Assessment and Ethics. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (2):95-122.
Carl Friedrich Gethmann (2002). Participatory Technology Assessment: Some Critical Questions. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 1 (2):151-159.
Erich Griessler (2012). One Size Fits All? On the Institutionalization of Participatory Technology Assessment and its Interconnection with National Ways of Policy-Making: The Cases of Switzerland and Austria. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):61-80.
Diego Compagna (2012). Lost in Translation? The Dilemma of Alignment Within Participatory Technology Developments. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):125-143.
Michiel van Oudheusden (2011). Questioning 'Participation': A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):673-690.
Armin Grunwald (1994). Wissenschaftstheoretische Anmerkungen Zur Technikfolgenabschätzung: Die Prognose- Und Quantifizierungsproblematik. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 25 (1):51 - 70.
Karen Kastenhofer (2010). Do We Need a Specific Kind of Technoscience Assessment? Taking the Convergence of Science and Technology Seriously. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):37-54.
Matt Ferkany & Kyle Powys Whyte (2012). The Importance of Participatory Virtues in the Future of Environmental Education. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):419-434.
Karen Kastenhofer & Astrid Schwarz (2011). Probing Technoscience. Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):61-65.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-11-15
Total downloads3 ( #340,734 of 1,679,405 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #183,757 of 1,679,405 )
How can I increase my downloads?