Group Affiliation and Entry Barriers: The Dark Side Of Business Groups In Emerging Markets

Journal of Business Ethics 153 (4):1051-1066 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Business groups dominate the economic landscape in many economies around the world. While business groups overcome the institutional voids arising due to inefficiencies of external markets, they also possess market power, which could be economically and socially counterproductive, especially for unaffiliated firms. Drawing on the transaction cost and industrial organization economics, we examine whether the presence of business group affiliated firms in industries restricts the entry of unaffiliated firms or firms affiliated with small- and medium-size business groups. Findings based on Indian firms suggest that investments by business group affiliated firms in an industry have an inverted U-shaped relationship with the investment by unaffiliated firms. However, investments by firms affiliated with large-sized business groups have a U-shaped relationship with the investment by affiliates of small and medium business groups. These findings suggest that the market power of business groups and entry barrier relationship is contingent on the size of the business groups.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Business Groups and Tax Havens.Weichieh Su & Danchi Tan - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 153 (4):1067-1081.
Industry Social Standings.James Weber & Jennifer J. Griffin - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:190-195.
Outside director remuneration and the decision to grant CEO stock options.Kiridaran Kanagaretnam, Robert Mathieu & Ramachandran Ramanan - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):137-146.
Promoting moral growth through intra-group participation.D. R. Nelson & T. E. Obremski - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (9):731 - 739.
Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics.Laura J. Spence - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (3):163-174.
Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics.Laura J. Spence - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (3):163–174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-13

Downloads
9 (#1,254,017)

6 months
2 (#1,198,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The manipulative business and society.Brian W. Kulik, Michelle Alarcon & Manjula S. Salimath - 2020 - Business and Society Review 125 (1):89-118.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does Business Ethics Rest on a Mistake?John R. Boatright - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (4):583-591.
Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace.Melville T. Cottrill - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (9):723 - 729.
Business ethics in a competitive market.Julianne Nelson - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (9):663 - 666.
Morality and Markets.John Hendry - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (3):537-545.

View all 7 references / Add more references