A Neo-Kantian Critique of Von Mises's Epistemology

Economics and Philosophy 12 (1):51 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

More than many other Austrians, Mises tried to found aprioristic methodology on a well defined and developed epistemology. Although references to Kant are scattered rather unsystematically throughout his works, he nevertheless used an unequivocal Kantian terminology. He explicitly defended the existence of ‘a priori knowledge’, ‘synthetic a priori propositions’, ‘the category of action’, and so forth

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemological Problems of Economics.Ludwig Von Mises - 1976 - New York: New York University Press. Edited by George Reisman & Bettina Bien Greaves.
Theory and History.Ludwig Von Mises - 1957 - New York: Garland.
Theory and history.Ludwig Von Mises - 1957 - New Rochelle, N.Y.,: Arlington House.
What does (the young) Heidegger Mean by the Seinsfrage?Carleton B. Christensen - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (3-4):411 – 437.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
115 (#153,701)

6 months
12 (#207,528)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pierluigi Barrotta
University of Pisa

Citations of this work

Parsons on Mises and Kant: A Comment.Pierluigi Barrotta - 1998 - Economics and Philosophy 14 (1):127-130.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Conjectures and Refutations.Karl Popper - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):159-168.

View all 12 references / Add more references