Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders”

&
American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):W5-W7 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We respond to open peer commentaries on our target article, "Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders"

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2018.1536769

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders.Leah Pierson & Joseph Millum - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (11):6-17.
The Social Value of Health Research and the Worst Off.Nicola Barsdorf & Joseph Millum - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (2):105-115.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Governance of Transnational Global Health Research Consortia and Health Equity”.Adnan A. Hyder & Bridget Pratt - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):4-6.
Changing the Discourse on Health Systems Research: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Review of Health Systems Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Conceptual Exploration”.Adnan A. Hyder & Abbas Rattani - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (2):W1-W2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Health Literacy, Health Inequality and a Just Health Care System”.Angelo E. Volandes - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (11):W1-W2.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Health Literacy, Health Inequality and a Just Health Care System".Angelo E. Volandes & Michael K. Paasche-Orlow - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (11):1-2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Fair Resource Allocation to Health Research: Priority Topics for Bioethics Scholarship.Adnan A. Hyder & Bridget Pratt - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (4):454-466.
Ethics of open access to biomedical research: Just a special case of ethics of open access to research.Stevan Harnad - 2007 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2:31.
Exploring the ethics of global health research priority-setting.Bridget Pratt, Mark Sheehan, Nicola Barsdorf & Adnan A. Hyder - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):94.
A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Developing Countries.Lydia Kapiriri & Douglas K. Martin - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (3):159-167.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
Priority Setting Is More Than Resource Allocation: Reflecting on the Content of Funders’ Duties and Their Implications for Current Practice.Bridget Pratt & Adnan A. Hyder - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (11):27-30.
Shaping Biomedical Research Priorities: The Case of the National Institutes of Health. [REVIEW]Daniel Callahan - 1999 - Health Care Analysis 7 (2):115-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-26

Downloads
294 (#69,076)

6 months
96 (#46,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Millum
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Pfizer’s Corporate Citizenship.Nancy S. Jecker - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (11):18-20.
Practical Problems Related to Health Research Funding Decisions.David B. Resnik - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (11):21-22.

View all 8 references / Add more references