- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Respecting the Value-Laden Nature of Participant Preferences: AI, Digital Phenotyping, and Psychiatry
American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):93-96 (2024)
Abstract
We applaud Shen et al. (2024) for offering a framework to address how to return research results from digital phenotyping within the discipline of psychiatry. However, given the value-laden nature...Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
First-person disavowals of digital phenotyping and epistemic injustice in psychiatry.Stephanie K. Slack & Linda Barclay - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (4):605-614.
Psychiatry, Ethics, and Digital Phenotyping: Moral Challenges and Considerations for Returning Mental Health Research Results to College Students.Craig W. McFarland, Makenna E. Law, Ivan E. Ramirez, Ithika S. Senthilnathan & Kelisha M. Williams - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):105-108.
Return of Results in Digital Phenotyping: Ethical Considerations for Real-World Use Cases.John Torous & Charlotte Blease - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):91-93.
Contending with Real and Perceived Intrusiveness in Digital Phenotyping Research.Josianne Barrette-Moran & Charles Dupras - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):108-110.
Potential Iatrogenic Effects of Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.Kate Finley - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):110-112.
Digital/computational phenotyping: What are the differences in the science and the ethics?Nina Hallowell & Federica Lucivero - 2021 - Big Data and Society 8 (2).
For what it's worth. Unearthing the values embedded in digital phenotyping for mental health.Gabrielle Samuel, Federica Lucivero, Anna Lavis & Rasmus Birk - 2021 - Big Data and Society 8 (2).
Digital Phenotyping: an Epistemic and Methodological Analysis.Simon Coghlan & Simon D’Alfonso - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1905-1928.
Digital phenotyping and the (data) shadow of Alzheimer's disease.Natassia Brenman, Alessia Costa & Richard Milne - 2022 - Big Data and Society 9 (1).
Incidental Findings from Deep Phenotyping Research in Psychiatry: Legal and Ethical Considerations.Amanda Kim, Michael Hsu, Amanda Koire & Matthew L. Baum - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (4):482-486.
Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.Francis X. Shen, Matthew L. Baum, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Adam S. Miner, Melissa Abraham, Catherine A. Brownstein, Nathan Cortez, Barbara J. Evans, Laura T. Germine, David C. Glahn, Christine Grady, Ingrid A. Holm, Elisa A. Hurley, Sara Kimble, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, Kimberlyn Leary, Mason Marks, Patrick J. Monette, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, P. Pearl O’Rourke, Scott L. Rauch, Carmel Shachar, Srijan Sen, Ipsit Vahia, Jason L. Vassy, Justin T. Baker, Barbara E. Bierer & Benjamin C. Silverman - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):69-90.
Precision medicine and digital phenotyping: Digital medicine's way from more data to better health.Renate Baumgartner - 2021 - Big Data and Society 8 (2).
Personalized Roadmaps for Returning Results From Digital Phenotyping.Kristin Marie Kostick-Quenet, John Herrington & Eric A. Storch - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):102-105.
Balancing the Double-Edged Implications of AI in Psychiatric Digital Phenotyping.Katherine Bassil - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):113-115.
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Digital Phenotyping as a Future Solution for Present-Day Challenges: A Scoping Review.Ana Tomičić, Anamaria Malešević & Anto Čartolovni - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (1):1-25.
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-02-02
Downloads
5 (#1,540,420)
6 months
5 (#639,460)
2024-02-02
Downloads
5 (#1,540,420)
6 months
5 (#639,460)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Epistemic Injustice and Illness.Ian James Kidd & Havi Carel - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):172-190.
Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.Francis X. Shen, Matthew L. Baum, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Adam S. Miner, Melissa Abraham, Catherine A. Brownstein, Nathan Cortez, Barbara J. Evans, Laura T. Germine, David C. Glahn, Christine Grady, Ingrid A. Holm, Elisa A. Hurley, Sara Kimble, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, Kimberlyn Leary, Mason Marks, Patrick J. Monette, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, P. Pearl O’Rourke, Scott L. Rauch, Carmel Shachar, Srijan Sen, Ipsit Vahia, Jason L. Vassy, Justin T. Baker, Barbara E. Bierer & Benjamin C. Silverman - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):69-90.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-cl5t5 uwo