Sexual identity and neurosexism: A critique of reductivist approaches of sexual behavior and gender

Dissertatio 45 (S5):22-37 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper will unfold in two different critiques, first dealing with how neuroscience has sexed the brain, ignoring cultural elements of gender formation, and further focusing on the masculine bias of neuroscience research, which, we claim, adopts male physiological and social patterns as “normal”. In order to do so, we will start our investigation with some insights on the sex/gender debate and how it is of consequence for research on neurosciences of sexuality. Secondly, we will critic the way studies are focusing on differences rather than similarities between genders, and how such strategy re-enforces gender biases. Finally, we use contributions from social cognitivist theory and feminism to support a more complex view of body, identity and gender performance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bodily Or Gender Identity?Aurel Codoban - 2002 - Studia Philosophica 2.
A dispositional account of gender.Jennifer McKitrick - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2575-2589.
A Probe Into Social Sex.Ya-jun Qu - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:11-15.
Gender.Claire Colebrook - 2003 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Artificial Ef-femination.Marla Morton-Brown - 2004 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):27-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-29

Downloads
5 (#1,522,914)

6 months
3 (#987,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations