Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (2) (1993)
|Abstract||This paper proposes that neurodynamic system theory may be used to connect structural and functional aspects of neural organization. The paper claims that generalized causal dynamic models are proper tools for describing the self-organizing mechanism of the nervous system. In particular, it is pointed out that ontogeny, development, normal performance, learning, and plasticity, can be treated by coherent concepts and formalism. Taking into account the self-referential character of the brain, autopoiesis, endophysics and hermeneutics are offered as elements of a poststructuralist brain (-mind-computer) theory.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael A. Arbib & Péter Érdi (2000). Précis of Neural Organization: Structure, Function, and Dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):513-533.
V. K. Jirsa & J. A. S. Kelso (2000). Beyond the Limits of the Brain as a Physical System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):405-406.
Austen Clark (1984). Seeing and Summing: Implications of Computational Theories of Vision. Cognition and Brain Theory 7 (1):1-23.
Gregory Landini (2000). Quantification Theory in *9 of Principia Mathematica. History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (1):57-77.
Shimon Edelman (2000). Brahe, Looking for Kepler. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):538-540.
D. Heinke (2000). A Dynamical System Theory Approach to Cognitive Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):543-543.
Michael A. Arbib & Peter Érdi (2000). Organizing the Brain's Diversities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):551-565.
Alastair Butler (2007). Scope Control and Grammatical Dependencies. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (3).
Péter Érdi (2000). On the 'Dynamic Brain' Metaphor. Brain and Mind 1 (1):119-145.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,517 of 549,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?