David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 50 (5):489 – 496 (2007)
Before and in the Groundwork , Kant argues as follows for the validity of the moral law: we want to be free. Following the moral law is the only way to be free. So we should follow the moral law.1 The first premise of this syllogism is treated differently before and in the Groundwork . First Kant thought it an empirical fact that men want to be free and want it more than anything else.2 Later he sought an a priori argument showing that we ought to want to be free and are right in thinking it good.3 The former justification of the moral law is superior. When we look to “salvage the normative core of Kantian moral philosophy” (Guyer 445), we should turn to it. - So far Paul Guyer. It is evident that Guyer fails to describe Kant's thought in the Groundwork . It is equally clear that Kant never held the position Guyer claims he held before the Groundwork . (The quotations Guyer gives in support of his claim show this.) Therefore I shall not discuss Guyer's interpretation of Kant. Instead I shall consider the philosophical merits of the position he ascribes to the pre-critical Kant, and which he recommends as superior. We shall see that that position makes no sense. This indirectly addresses the interpretive question, as it is a reason against ascribing it to Kant.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Guyer (2000). Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Guyer (2006). Kant. Routledge.
Paul Guyer (1997). Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Guyer (2007). Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Inquiry 50 (5):444 – 464.
James Phillips (2011). Placing Ugliness in Kant's Third Critique : A Reply to Paul Guyer. Kant-Studien 102 (3):385-395.
Paul Guyer (2009). Problems with Freedom : Kant's Argument in Groundwork III and its Subsequent Emendations. In Jens Timmermann (ed.), Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
Andrews Reath (2003). Value and Law in Kant's Moral Theory. [REVIEW] Ethics 114 (1):127-155.
Henry E. Allison (2007). Comments on Guyer. Inquiry 50 (5):480 – 488.
Allen W. Wood (2007). Comments on Guyer. Inquiry 50 (5):465 – 479.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #77,683 of 1,906,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,378 of 1,906,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?