David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Pakistan Business Review 14 (3):490-517 (2012)
In this paper I propose a framework to understand the transition in Foucault’s work from the disciplinary model to the governmentality model. Foucault’s work on power emerges within the general context of an expression of capitalist rationality and the nature of freedom and power within it. I argue that, thus understood, Foucault’s transition to the governmentality model can be seen simultaneously as a deepening recognition of what capitalism is and how it works, but also as a recognition of the changing historical nature of the actually existing capitalisms and their specifically situated historical needs. I then argue that the disciplinary model should be understood as a contingent response to the demands of early capitalism, and argue that with the maturation of the capitalist enterprise many of those responses are no longer necessary. New realities require new responses; although this does not necessarily result in the abandonment of the earlier disciplinary model, it does require their reconfiguration according to the changed situation and the new imperatives following from it.
|Keywords||Foucault Capitalism Disciplines Power Freedom Governmentality Biopolitics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Protevi (2009). What Does Foucault Think is New About Neo-Liberalism? Pli: Warwick Journal of Philosophy 21:1-25.
Robert Sinnerbrink (2005). From Machenschaft to Biopolitics: A Genealogical Critique of Biopower. Critical Horizons 6 (1):239-265.
Derek Kerr (1999). Beheading the King and Enthroning the Market: A Critique of Foucauldian Governmentality. Science and Society 63 (2):173 - 202.
Ali Rizvi (2006). FOUCAULT AND CAPITALIST RATIONALITY: A RECONSTRUCTION. Market Forces 1 (4):23-33.
Alan Petersen (2003). Governmentality, Critical Scholarship, and the Medical Humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3-4):187-201.
Thomas Biebricher (2008). Genealogy and Governmentality. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):363-396.
Gordon Hull (2008). One View of the Dungeon: Torture and the Ticking Time Bomb Between Governmentality and Sovereignty. International Studies in Philosophy 40 (2):11-31.
Jason L. Powell (ed.) (2012). Foucault: Issues and Legacy. Nova Science Publishers.
Michel Foucault (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. République Française.
Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann & Thomas Lemke (2010). From Foucault's Lectures at the Collège de France to Studies of Governmentality : An Introduction. In Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann & Thomas Lemke (eds.), Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. Routledge. 1.
Michel Foucault (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977-1978. Palgrave Macmillan.
Paul Patton (2005). Foucault, Critique and Rights. Critical Horizons 6 (1):267-287.
Didier Fassin (2010). Coming Back to Life : An Anthropological Reassessment of Biopolitics and Governmentality. In Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann & Thomas Lemke (eds.), Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. Routledge. 185.
Colin Koopman (2010). Revising Foucault: The History and Critique of Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):545-565.
Added to index2011-06-29
Total downloads394 ( #751 of 1,410,160 )
Recent downloads (6 months)46 ( #2,506 of 1,410,160 )
How can I increase my downloads?