Is it time to abandon institutional research ethics committees?

Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S74-S77 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Research on human beings has significantly increased in ethical and scientific complexity. Ethics review is at a fork in the road. Either we significantly increase the resources we provide to support institutional research ethics committees. Or we abandon the institutional base of human research ethics review and move to model of expert suprainstitutional ethics committees.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf03351281

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees.C. A. Schuppli & D. Fraser - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):294-301.
Research ethics review and the bureaucracy.Paul M. McNeill - 2002 - Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S72-S73.
Getting beyond form filling: The role of institutional governance in human research ethics. [REVIEW]Gary Allen - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116.
The structure of ethics review: expert ethics committees and the challenge of voluntary research euthanasia.Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):491-493.
Research ethics committees at work: the experience of one multi-location study.A. E. While - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):352-355.
Should Epidemiological Studies Be Subject to Ethics Review?Jan Piasecki, Vilius Dranseika & Marcin Waligora - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (2):213-220.
Tis but a scratch: The human tissue act and the use of tissue for research, issues for research ethics committees.David Hunter - unknown
Barriers to the Ethics Committee in India: Ethical and Quality Issues.Madhuri Patel, Kannan Sridharan & Jayesh Patel - 2016 - Asian Bioethics Review 8 (2):81-93.
Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?E. Pickworth - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5):330-333.
Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority.S. McGuinness - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):695-700.
Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Leslie Gelling & Carol Munn-Giddings - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):100-106.
The value of sharing genomic findings with research ethics committees.Angeliki Kerasidou - 2017 - Research Ethics 13 (2):59-64.
Responsibility, Expertise and Trust: Institutional Ethics Committees and Science.Suzanne Uniacke - 2015 - Humana Mente 8 (28):169-185.
Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.E. Atici & A. D. Erdemir - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):297-300.
Contrasting institutional review boards with institutional ethics committees.Leonard H. Glantz - 1984 - In Ronald E. Cranford & A. Edward Doudera (eds.), Institutional Ethics Committees and Health Care Decision Making. Health Administration Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-03

Downloads
5 (#1,533,504)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references