God’s Divinely Justified Knowledge is Incompatible with Human Free Will

Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (1):141-159 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A new version of the incompatibilist argument is developed. Knowledge is justified true belief. If God’s divine knowledge must be justified knowledge, then humans cannot have the “alternative possibilities” type of free will. This incompatibilist argument is immunized against the application of the hard-soft fact distinction. If divine knowledge is justified, then the only kind of facts that God can know are hard facts, permitting this incompatibilist argument to succeed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God’s Divinely Justified Knowledge is Incompatible with Human Free Will.John Shook - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (1):141-159.
God's Justified Knowledge and the Hard-Soft Fact Distinction.John R. Shook - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:69-73.
God's Justified Knowledge and the Hard-Soft Fact Distinction.John R. Shook - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:69-73.
Knowledge: Undefeated justified true belief.Keith Lehrer & Thomas Paxson - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (8):225-237.
Is justified true behavior knowledge?.Frank Hammonds - 2010 - Behavior and Philosophy 38:49-59.
What the Consequence Argument Is an Argument For.Justin A. Capes - 2019 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):50-56.
Free Acts and Chance: Why The Rollback Argument Fails.Lara Buchak - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):20-28.
Does God have Beliefs?: WILLIAM P. ALSTON.William P. Alston - 1986 - Religious Studies 22 (3-4):287-306.
Justified Belief: Knowledge First‐Style.Christoph Kelp - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (1):79-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-19

Downloads
6 (#1,454,899)

6 months
3 (#962,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Shook
University at Buffalo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Divine omniscience and voluntary action.Nelson Pike - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):27-46.
Freedom and foreknowledge.John Martin Fischer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (1):67-79.
Foreknowledge and Necessity.William Hasker - 1985 - Faith and Philosophy 2 (2):121-157.
Foreknowledge and Necessity.William Hasker - 1985 - Faith and Philosophy 2 (2):121-157.

Add more references