Painting for Fools

Theory, Culture and Society 40 (1-2):179-200 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Manuscripts and notes by Michel Foucault on the visual arts recently deposited at the Bibliothèque Nationale reveal a reliance on canonical oil paintings by the ‘old masters’; a respect for the primary sources in the history of European art; an understanding of the necessity of research in both literary and visual sources, particularly self-portraits; and a sense of the value that a certain philosophical milieu – beginning with Sade and Nietzsche and expanding to his near contemporaries, Bataille, Blanchot, and Klossowski – could offer to an understanding of paintings. The essay argues that Pierre Klossowski’s monumental drawing La Nef des fous (1990) provides an essential key for understanding the place of Hieronymus Bosch’s painting of the same title in History of Madness and the centrality of theories of similitude to Foucault’s thinking about visuality ca. 1960–74. The later significance of the figure of the artist for Foucault can be traced to these earlier writings on painting and madness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foucault on painting.Catherine M. Soussloff - 2017 - Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault on painting.Catherine M. Soussloff - 2011 - History of the Human Sciences 24 (4):113-123.
Ni Zan's Aesthetic thought of Painting.Shan Li - 2011 - Philosophy and Culture 38 (9):151-174.
Depicting.Roger Squires - 1969 - Philosophy 44 (169):193 - 204.
Painting, sculpture, sight, and touch.Robert Hopkins - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):149-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-29

Downloads
9 (#1,248,077)

6 months
7 (#419,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?